Saturday, February 5, 2011

2011 Moscow Open

Update on the Young Grandmasters (Women) Tournament portion of the Moscow Open:


Name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total
Place
1
 Fominykh, Maria
1/2
0
0
1/2
0
0
1

0
2

2
 Girya, Olga
1/2
1/2
0
1/2
0
1/2

1
1/2
3,5

3
 Kosteniuk, Alexandra
1
1/2
1
1
1

1
0
1
6,5

4
 Gunina, Valentina
1
1
0
1

0
1
1
0
5

5
 Galoyan, Lilit
1/2
1/2
0
0
1/2
0
1
1/2

3

6
 Zawadzka, Jolanta
1
1
0

1/2
0
0
1/2
1/2
3,5

7
 Munguntuul, Batkhuyag
1
1/2

1
1
1
1
1
0
6,5

8
 Ambartsumova, Karina
0

0
0
0
1
0
1
2

9
 Kashlinskaya, Alina

0
1
0
1/2
1/2
0
0
1
3

10
 Zhao Xue
1
1/2
0
1

1/2
1
1
0
5

GM Alexandra Kosteniuk has tied the score with front-runner Batkhuyag Munguntuul, with one more round to go.  Here are the results from today's game (R8):

1 Zhao, Xue 0 - 1 Kashlinskaya, Alina
2 Fominykh, Maria 1 - 0 Ambartsumova, Karina
3 Girya, Olga 0,5 - 0,5 Munguntuul, Batkhuyag
4 Kosteniuk, Alexandra 1 - 0 Zawadzka, Jolanta
5 Gunina, Valentina 1 - 0 Galojan, Lilit

In true Hollywood fashion, Kosteniuk and Munguntuul will face off against each other in the final round! Stay tuned!

It's a Stupid Law in the USA and It's a Stupid Law in Great Britain, Too

Legislation forces archaeologists to rebury finds
Bones and skulls from ancient settlements will be reburied and lost to science under controversial legislation that threatens to cripple archeological research
Ian Sample, science correspondent
The Guardian, Friday 4 February 2011

Human remains from Stonehenge and other ancient settlements will be reburied and lost to science under legislation that threatens to cripple research into the history of humans in Britain, a group of leading archaeologists says today.

In a letter addressed to the justice secretary, Ken Clarke, and printed in the Guardian today, 40 archaeology professors write of their "deep and widespread concern" about the issue.

The dispute centres on legislation introduced by the Ministry of Justice in 2008 which requires all human remains excavated at digs in England and Wales to be reburied within two years, regardless of their age. The decision, which amounts to a reinterpretation of law previously administered by the Home Office, means scientists have too little time to study bones and other human remains of national and cultural significance, the academics say.

"Your current requirement that all archaeologically excavated human remains should be reburied, whether after a standard period of two years or a further special extension, is contrary to fundamental principles of archaeological and scientific research and of museum practice," they write. Signatories include Chris Stringer, head of human origins at the Natural History Museum in London; Stephen Shennan, director of University College London's archaeology institute; and Helena Hamerow, head of archaeology at Oxford University.

The ruling applies to any pieces of bone uncovered at around 400 dig sites, including the remains of 60 or so bodies found at Stonehenge in 2008 that date back to 3,000BC. Archaeologists have been granted a temporary extension to give them more time, but ultimately the bones will have to be returned to the ground.

The arrangements, the archaeologists say, may result in the squandering of future discoveries at sites such as Happisburgh in Norfolk, where excavations are continuing after the discovery of stone tools made by early humans 950,000 years ago.

"If human remains were found at Happisburgh they would be the oldest human fossils in northern Europe and the first indication of what this species was. Under the current practice of the law those remains would have to be reburied and effectively destroyed," said Mike Pitts, editor of British Archaeology. "This applies to everything. If we were to find a Neanderthal fossil or a Roman skeleton, it would all have to be reburied."

Prior to 2008, guidelines allowed for the proper curation and study of bones of sufficient age and historical interest, while the Burial Act 1857 applied to more recent remains, such as those exhumed from the St Pancras Old Church cemetery to build the London Eurostar train terminal. The Ministry of Justice assured archaeologists two years ago that the ruling was an interim measure, but has so far failed to revise its decision.

Mike Parker Pearson, an archaeologist at Sheffield University, said: "Archaeologists have been extremely patient because we were led to believe the ministry was sorting out this problem, but we feel that we cannot wait any longer.

"Whereas we have museum collections of ancient and prehistoric human remains that have been dug up in some cases hundreds of years ago, we are about to lose all of the well-excavated, well-documented skeletal material that has been excavated since 2008," he added.

The ministry has no guidelines on where or how remains should be reburied, or on what records should be kept.

Removing the need to rebury ancient human remains within two years would give archaeologists the option to study excavated bones with new scientific techniques that constantly emerge from research laboratories, the letter says.

Remains from dozens of sites are immediately at risk of reburial, including eight bronze and iron age bodies found at Clay Farm in Cambridgeshire, 50 or so skeletons from the cemetery of a medieval hospital in Bawtry, South Yorkshire, and a remarkable Viking mass burial site excavated during work on the Weymouth relief road in 2009.

"The government is asking us to destroy important materials, not preserve them for future generations, a situation that is against its own heritage policies, contra to the public will and not in the interests of the general public at large," said Duncan Sayer, an archaeologist at the University of Central Lancashire.

"This is a law that was not designed for archaeology and is doing a considerable amount of damage, and because of it we may prevent people in the future from ever being able to explore their past because we have destroyed it."

Looting in Egypt Continues - Rare Tomb at Saqqara May Be Destroyed

Report by Andrew Lawler at Science Insider:

Egypt Update: Rare Tomb May Have Been Destroyed
by Andrew Lawler on 3 February 2011, 5:26 PM

[Excerpted] Reports of damage to one of the few ancient Egyptian tombs devoted solely to a woman have tempered the news that most of Egypt's priceless antiquities have escaped damage and that teams of foreign archaeologists are safe amid widespread protests against the regime led by Hosni Mubarak.

One archaeologist present at the famous cemetery of Saqqara, south of Cairo, said that as many as 200 looters were digging for treasure in the area this past weekend before police resecured the area. The excavator, who requested anonymity, added that the tomb of Maya, the wet nurse of King Tutankhamun, was "completely destroyed." Another Western archaeologist said, "We still don't know the extent of the damage, but things have been bad and out of control."

Full article.


The good news is that other major archaeological sites appear to be quiet - at the moment. But as of Saturday "all foreign expeditions were ordered to halt work and leave." Leave? Leave the country? Leave the sites but stay in the country? If all is quiet, why should they stop working and leave? This sounds very suspicious to me.

Cf. reports in this article from Archaeology Magazine online:

Letter from Cairo
February 4, 2011
by ARCHAEOLOGY correspondent Mike Elkin

[Excerpted]What concerns the Egyptologists I spoke to, however, is the funerary site of Saqqara, which suffered a 36-hour gap in security before the army moved in around the site. Hawass insists that no looting took place. Some locks on tombs were broken, but the intruders caused no damage inside nor stole anything. "If anything had happened it would have been a disaster," he said.

Several archaeologists with contacts at Saqqara, who requested anonymity, confirmed this assessment. But they added that storage facilities were robbed, something the Supreme Council of Antiquities has denied. Inspectors, sources said, are evaluating the damage to the site with the army because the looters might be armed. The site is now closed to the public.

I spoke to an archaeologist at the French mission, who works at Saqqara and was in Cairo. "We've heard a lot of conflicting stories and many things on the Internet are wrong," he told me, based on calls to his Egyptian counterparts. "People were saying that my site in south Saqqara was destroyed, but in reality only two tents were damaged. We just have to wait and see, because now we have orders to stay out. On Sunday, looters were shooting at inspectors, who were very brave. Looting in Saqqara is nothing new, but before the army arrived, the site was left unguarded."

Friday, February 4, 2011

Are You Kidding? Modern Man Rediscovers Ancient Goddess Symbols!

This article - okay - I'm retracting my first statement, which was THIS ARTICLE IS A JOKE.  Forget I wrote that.  Instead, I'm just writing "Duh!" 

Gimbutas depicted such symbols in her many books on "Old European" culture that are twice as old as this one beginning - what - 30 years ago!  Those "zig-zags" - I call them "M's" and "W's" - wave patterns, are extremely ancient, dating back to at least 25,000 BCE and are found in many places in Europe; the symbols travel the width and breath of the Old World across time, and are evidence in the art work of Native Americans too.  The most likely explanation is not independent invention by relocating populations but that the extremely ancient patterns and symbols travelled with the people to the New World.   

What's the symbol for the primal waters of the deep in many ancient cultures in their later writing - DUH!  Wavy lines!  One that immediately comes to mind is "n-n" -- pronounced something like "nuuuun" in ancient Egyptian, drawn something like vvvv or wwww, -- in heiroglyphics.  It meant WATER, more importantly, the very first waters out of which the first mound of earth (the black dirt) arose, from which all things on earth were then created.  From the ancient waters of the deep came the first earth, and from the first earth all things of creation were made.

I don't have my notes/research from many years in front of me, so I'm working from memory, but these forms (wwww's and vvvvv's - zig-zags) are well documented by many researchers, not just Gimbutas. In many extremely early instances they were associated with carvings of "bird" or "eye" goddesses.  So making a big hoo-ha about this relatively young carving on an antler is, to my way of thinking, way out of proportion.  It is nice to see that the work of the early pioneers is being confirmed by modern-day discoveries, but they are adding nothing new to the subject and give scant credit to the work upon which they are building.  That's just not right.

From Discovery News
Stone Age Fertility Ritual Object Found
Etchings on a carved elk antler dating to nearly 11,000 years ago, may have been used to promote fertility
By Jennifer Vargas
February 4, 2011

A Stone Age-era artifact carved with multiple zigzags and what is likely a woman with spread legs suggests that fertility rituals may have been important to early Europeans, according to new research.

The object, which will be documented in the March issue of the Journal of Archaeological Science, is made out of a large elk antler and has been radiocarbon dated to about 10,900 years ago.

"The ornament is composed of groups of zigzag lines and a human representation, probably a woman with spread legs with a short zigzag nearby," lead author Tomasz Płonka told Discovery News. "The woman may be nude, but the geometrical style of representation does not allow us to answer (this question)."

Płonka, a University of Wroclaw archaeologist, and his colleagues analyzed the object, unearthed by a farmer at Swidwin, Poland.

At first the scientists believed the geometrical figure carved onto the antler could have been either the mentioned woman, or a nude man raising his arms. Measurements to determine the ratio of the stick figure limbs, in addition to comparisons with other early human representations, lead the researchers to support the woman interpretation. [Turn it one way, it's a man with a long penis! Turn it the other way, it's a woman with raised legs!  Neolithic optical illusion, all within an economical sketch of  - how's that for pushing an art form back!]

Zigzags are very popular motifs on artifacts from many cultures throughout the world, with many possible meanings, but Płonka said, "I think our zigzag lines are connected with water and life symbolism." [Gee! Ya think?]

Rest of article

Revisting DNA in Polynesia Leads to Surprising Discoveries

I keep thinking about the new knowledge we will have about the movement of people and languages and cultures 25 years from now, as our scientific tools -- and our applications of those tools to existing archaeological evidence -- are re-applied to that existing evidence (as long as it does not mysteriously disappear), and new forensic techniques utilizing knowledge of multiple cross-specialities that we can't even imagine in 2011 -- come to be and are also applied to that existing evidence.  And that doesn't even begin to address what new evidence in archaeolgy, linguistics, paleo-botany, etc. etc. may come to light utilizing 21st century techniques of uncovering and analyzing ancient settlements, mathematical applications of computer algorithms to deciphering unknown languages and written symbols, etc. etc.  Oh - and advances in DNA analysis, too!  LOL!  I'll be a little old bitchy lady with a cane (and knows how to use it), still spry 25 years from now.  I don't intend to croak until I'm at least 100, and I envision a whole brave new world in 2051 and after, for my nieces and nephews and their descendants.  Yep, it won't seem at all strange then, to acknowledge that ancestors of Native Americans (from east and west) roamed Canada, the USA, Central America and South America from 50,000 BCE and maybe even before then. 

From Science Daily
Genetic Study Uncovers New Path to Polynesia
ScienceDaily (Feb. 3, 2011) — Surprising new evidence which overturns current theories of how humans colonised the Pacific has been discovered by scientists at the University of Leeds, UK

Map of Polynesia. Not from article.
The islands of Polynesia were first inhabited around 3,000 years ago, but where these people came from has long been a hot topic of debate amongst scientists. The most commonly accepted view, based on archaeological and linguistic evidence as well as genetic studies, is that Pacific islanders were the latter part of a migration south and eastwards from Taiwan which began around 4,000 years ago.

But the Leeds research -- published February 3 in The American Journal of Human Genetics -- has found that the link to Taiwan does not stand up to scrutiny. In fact, the DNA of current Polynesians can be traced back to migrants from the Asian mainland who had already settled in islands close to New Guinea some 6-8,000 years ago.

The type of DNA extracted and analysed in this kind of study is that stored in the cell's mitochondria. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is passed down the maternal line, providing a record of inheritance which goes back thousands of years. The scientists look for genetic signatures which enable them to classify the DNA into different lineages and then use a 'molecular clock' to date when these lineages moved into different parts of the world.

Lead researcher, Professor Martin Richards, explains: "Most previous studies looked at a small piece of mtDNA, but for this research we studied 157 complete mitochondrial genomes in addition to smaller samples from over 4,750 people from across Southeast Asia and Polynesia. We also reworked our dating techniques to significantly reduce the margin of error. This means we can be confident that the Polynesian population -- at least on the female side -- came from people who arrived in the Bismarck Archipelago of Papua New Guinea thousands of years before the supposed migration from Taiwan took place."

Nevertheless, most linguists maintain that the Polynesian languages are part of the Austronesian language family which originates in Taiwan. And most archaeologists see evidence for a Southeast Asian influence on the appearance of the Lapita culture in the Bismarck Archipelago around 3,500 years ago. Characterised by distinctive dentate stamped ceramics and obsidian tools, Lapita is also a marker for the earliest settlers of Polynesia.

Professor Richards and co-researcher Dr Pedro Soares (now at the University of Porto), argue that the linguistic and cultural connections are due to smaller migratory movements from Taiwan that did not leave any substantial genetic impact on the pre-existing population.

"Although our results throw out the likelihood of any maternal ancestry in Taiwan for the Polynesians, they don't preclude the possibility of a Taiwanese linguistic or cultural influence on the Bismarck Archipelago at that time," explains Professor Richards. "In fact, some minor mitochondrial lineages back up this idea. It seems likely there was a 'voyaging corridor' between the islands of Southeast Asia and the Bismarck Archipelago carrying maritime traders who brought their language and artefacts and perhaps helped to create the impetus for the migration into the Pacific.

"Our study of the mtDNA evidence shows the interactions between the islands of Southeast Asia and the Pacific was far more complex than previous accounts tended to suggest and it paves the way for new theories of the spread of Austronesian languages."

The study, which involved researchers from the UK, Taiwan and Australia, was mainly funded by the British Academy, the Bradshaw Foundation and the European Union.

See full article for citations.

Retired Worker in Chocolate Factory Has Million Dollar Plus Rare Ming Vase

I love stories like this!

Fri Feb 4, 11:31 am ET
Discovered Ming vase will make retired factory worker wealthy
By Brett Michael Dykes (how could this possibly be a real name???)

It's the dream of any antique collector: You impulsively spend a few bucks on a trinket at an estate sale or an antiques store, and later discover that it's worth more than what you paid for it. Much more.

And that's pretty much the dream that came true for a 79-year-old British retired worker from the Cadbury chocolate factory, who recently walked into an auction house with a near-perfect Ming vase in a cardboard box.

It's unknown how the man, who wanted the press to refrain from publishing his name, came into possession of the rare vase, but staffers at Duke's—the Dorchester auction house that took it in—were astounded by the "spectacular find."

"When my colleague initially showed me what had arrived in a cardboard box I could not believe my eyes," Guy Schwinge of Duke's told the Guardian. "The vase is in perfect condition, and it is amazing to think that it has survived unscathed for almost six hundred years."

The BBC reported that the vase, which stands 11.5 inches tall, is the largest ever found of a rare group of early Ming "moonflasks" whose production dates somewhere between the years 1403 and 1424. That means it was manufactured during the reign of an emperor named Yongle; its distinctive features—such as the small loop handles—appear to be influenced by Islamic design.

Because the vase originates from China but shows the influence of Middle Eastern craftsmanship, auctioneers at Duke's expect the vase to draw the bids of wealthy collectors from both Asian and the Arab worlds. The auction is scheduled for May, and the item is expected to fetch at least a million pounds, or roughly $1.6 million U.S. dollars.

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Foxes Among the Beautiful Mosaic Floors in 1500 Byzantine Church

Being excavated in Horbat Midras, Israel.  The photographs aren't the best but the fine condition of the mosaic floor is astounding!

Story at pasthorizons.com
Salvage excavations in Israel uncover an impressive mosaic floor
Wednesday, February 2, 2011


Fox - center animal facing to the left (tail to the right), lower left.
 [Excerpted] Part of a 1,500-year-old Byzantine church, the mosaic floor was decorated with images of lions, foxes, fish and peacocks.

The excavation, conducted on behalf of the Israel Antiquities Authority was necessary due to the site being the target of robbers, trying to access its underground tunnels.

The ruins are built on top of another structure which is believed to have been in use in Roman times. Its underground tunnels were thought to have been used by Jewish rebels around the 2nd century AD. Horbat Midras is believed to be the site of a large Jewish settlement that dates from the Second Temple period until its destruction during the Bar Kokhba uprising in 135 CE.

The later basilica comprises a large flagstone courtyard from which worshippers passed into a corridor. Entering into the nave there were eight breathtaking marble columns that bore magnificent capitals which were imported from Turkey.

For the past month the Israel Antiquities Authority has been engaged in exposing the magnificent structure, unravelling its secrets and preserving the mosaic floors.


I would be very interested to read the possible interpretation of fox images being present inside what I assume is an Orthodox Christian church!

China Demands Removal of Artifacts from Silk Road Exhibit...

The "Beauty of Xiaohe". Image from Penn Current.
Buried circa 1800 BCE, one of approximately
500 mummies excavated in the Tarim Basin
over the past 40 years.
...that it had agreed to be exhibited in the ground-breaking exhibition.  No explanation was given for their demands.  The host museum (the Penn, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) complied with the demands and have withdrawn two Tarim Basin mummies from the exhibit (they would have been a HUGE draw), along with some 100 rare artifacts never before seen outside of China.  Evidently China has thrown another hissy fit for reasons that only it knows (but we can make some educated surmises).  The Penn people aren't talking.  What was to be a block-buster exhibit that presold thousands of tickets will now have that money refunded and a much reduced exhibit, with photos of the missing mummies and artifacts, offered instead.  The reduced exhibit will be open to all visitors ot the museum who pay its general admission.  The exhibit - with mummies and artifacts - has already been viewed at the Bowers Museum in Santa Ana, California and the Houston Museum of Natural Science before the final exhibit at the Penn Museum. 

Story at Pasthorizons.com
China demands removal of mummies and artifacts from Silk Road exhibition
February 3, 2011

Some possible hints about why the artifacts and mummies were pulled at the last second by the Chinese government (who conveniently turn blind eyes to the concepts of  "contract" and "rule of law") may be found in this article at the Los Angeles Times:

China thwarts 'Silk Road' exhibition in Philly -- and Bowers Museum could be out $27,500
February 3, 2011 | 10:38 am

February 2, 2011, 2:54 pm
China Asks Penn to Remove All Artifacts From ‘Silk Road’ Exhibition
By RANDY KENNEDY

2011 Moscow Open

This is the B Tournament for Young Masters (Women) standings after R6:


Name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total
Place
1
 Fominykh, Maria
1/2
0
0
1/2
0



0

2
 Girya, Olga
1/2
1/2
0
1/2



1
1/2
3

3
 Kosteniuk, Alexandra
1
1/2
1



1
0
1
4,5

4
 Gunina, Valentina
1
1
0


0
1
1

4

5
 Galoyan, Lilit
1/2
1/2


1/2
0
1
1/2

3

6
 Zawadzka, Jolanta
1



1/2
0
0
1/2
1/2
2,5

7
 Munguntuul, Batkhuyag



1
1
1
1
1
0
5

8
 Ambartsumova, Karina


0
0
0
1
0

1

9
 Kashlinskaya, Alina

0
1
0
1/2
1/2
0


2

10
 Zhao Xue
1
1/2
0


1/2
1
1

4


GM Alexandra Kosteniuk is in 2nd place with 4.5 with 4 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, half point behind current leader Batkhuay Munguntuul, who has 5 wins and 1 loss!  The ladies are certainly playing fighting chess.  Zhao Xue is in 3rd place with 4.0 with 3 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss!  You go, girls!
Moscow Open 2011 F
Rank after round 6
RankSNo.NameRtgFEDPtsBH.victFideW-We
111WIMCharochkina Daria2314RUS622S6212,10
214WGMNemcova Katerina2289CZE5255190,63
316WGMMirzoeva Elmira2216RUS522S4191,43
42IMBodnaruk Anastasia2425RUS522517-0,11
58WGMPourkashiyan Atousa2373IRI521S418S0,08
612WIMSeveriukhina Zoja2312RUS520S5160,10
71IMTurova Irina2434RUS4S25418S-0,31
829WFMSuslova Alena2180RUS4S254171,28
94WGMSavina Anastasia2397RUS4S23S417S-0,51
1023WFMBerdychevaskaya Natasha2193RUS4S21417S0,60
115WGMKovanova Baira2391RUS4S21416-0,50
127WGMNebolsina Vera2388RUS4S20S415S-0,54
1317WIMGhader Pour Shayesteh2212IRI4S20415S0,55
1413WGMDaulyte Deimante2293LTU4S20414-0,34
156WGMStepovaia Tatiana2389RUS4S17S414-0,77
1620Drozdova Dina2203RUS4S17315S0,16
1735WFMVerko Tatiana2147KAZ4224160,66
1833WFMBaraeva Marina2152RUS421S316S0,97
1924WFMBezgodova Maria2190RUS4214160,24
2050Ainutdinova Yekaterina2073KAZ420S4141,37
2157Severina Maria2032RUS420S314S1,88
2225WFMPetrukhina Irina2190RUS420414-0,14
2328WFMShulakova Svetlana2180RUS420315-0,02
2418WIMNakhbayeva Guliskhan2209KAZ419S415-0,31
46Zizlova Sofia2085RUS419S4151,33
2639WFMKineva Ekaterina2120RUS4194150,57
279FMPustovoitova Daria2331RUS419414-1,02
19WGMShaydullina Sandugach2207RUS419414-0,46
2921WFMBaraeva Irina2201RUS419313S-0,53
3038WIMKrasenkova Ilena2121RUS419313-0,23
3136WFMSemenova Elena2139RUS418S4140,08
323IMRomanko Marina2404RUS418312S-0,51
3372Kostitsina Liubov1930RUS417S4111,79
3434Schepetkova Margarita2148RUS414311-1,00
3540WFMKharmunova Nadejda2118RUS3S24S215S1,16
3671Makarenko Alexandra1931RUS3S24S2142,50
3741WFMBivol Alina2114RUS3S23S316S1,29
3843WFMGorozhankina Julia2088RUS3S22313S0,88
3931WFMGvanceladze Anna2163RUS3S21S3150,35
4090Mestnikova Tuyara1852RUS3S18S3112,34
4126WFMTravkina Anastasia2189RUS3S18S214-0,87
4215WGMDoluhanova Evgeniya2267UKR3S18313-1,39
4345WFMKorchagina Viktoria2086RUS3S183120,03
4430WFMEryshkanova Anastasiya2168RUS3S17212S-1,12
4558Tereshechkina Maya2026RUS3S16S312S-0,32
4622Bezgodova Svetlana2195RUS3S15S310-1,40
4732WIMSazonova Elena N2162RUS3S14S310-1,42
4844WFMKhropova Larisa2087RUS324S3130,67
4953Pershina Elena2053RUS323S3150,65
5091WCMEgorova Ayyyna1847RUS3223131,99
5151Frolova Ekaterina2067RUS3213130,07
5248WFMKostrikina Anna2079RUS321312-0,03
5388Rodionova Daria1856RUS320S3121,19
5459Avdeyeva Viktoriya2020AZE320S2130,68
5542WFMTsepennikova Tatyana2104RUS320S212-0,89
5687WFMVasenina Anna1857RUS320S210S1,11
5769WFMAbdumalik Zhansaya1938KAZ320S29S0,82
5849Markelova Lubov2076RUS320211S-0,67
5954Sviridova Vlada2052RUS319S212S-0,22
60Smirnova Ekaterina2018RUS319S212S-0,09
61115Manabayeva Aiya0KAZ318S212S
6210WGMLevushkina Elena2318GER318S211-2,34
6376WFMKisteneva Liza1911RUS318S29S0,54
6437Yakupova Aysyla2132RUS318311-1,27
6564Trapeznikova Darya1991RUS31839-0,02
81Maidanova Irina1871RUS31839-0,59
6775Medvedeva Anna1921RUS317S3100,49
6874Skakun Valentina1925RUS317S390,04
6927WIMButuc Maria2188RUS317212-1,66
7079Budueva Kristina1889RUS316S390,79
7163Khobotova Olesia1991RUS316S37-1,16
7252Maslova Elena2065RUS316311-0,97
7378Bauyrzhan Arnash1900KAZ31639-0,21
7486Paramzina Anastasya1860RUS314S381,16
7555WFMMatsenko Elena2039RUS314310-0,73
7694Aseeva Anastasia1807RUS313S370,62
7773WCMDordzhieva Dinara1929RUS2S212100,56
7862WFMStyazhkina Anna1999RUS2S2029-0,05
7970Achinova Giliana1936RUS2S19S28S-0,20
8065Mukhametgaleeva Railia1983RUS2S19290,27
8168Sysoykina Lidia1943RUS2S17S290,01
82101Mokshanova Elizaveta1711RUS2S17S17S1,44
8361WFMTrotsenko Evgenia2001RUS2S16S29S-0,75
84120Uskova Anna0RUS2S16S29
8593Chadaeva Tatiana1835RUS2S16S280,80
8680Sazonova Anastasia1886RUS2S1527S0,09
87117Skorobogatova Olga0RUS2S1326S
88113WCMObolentseva Alexandra0RUS2S1326
8967Anu Bayar1957MGL22129-0,25
90119Temirbieva Liana0RUS218S28
91114Badzgaradze Elena0RUS21829
9298Morozova Ulia1724RUS218270,84
9392Frantsuzova Lyudmila1839RUS21726-0,49
94103Saikhanzaya Ganbaatar1704MGL216S270,17
9583Arnatskaya Zoya1867RUS216S26-0,26
9666WFMKalashnikova Larisa1971RUS21616-1,53
97105Turygina Irina1650RUS215250,65
9885Ivanova Karina1865RUS214S27-0,63
9989Zasypkina Evgenia1855RUS214S25-0,93
10099Burmistrova Alena1720RUS214S24-0,28
10177Lisachenko Natalia1903RUS21426-1,44
102118Sprints Eleonora0RUS213S15S
10382Semenova Anastasia1870RUS21326-0,08
10497Sigua Irina1731RUS21325-0,19
105122Vasilieva Aisena0RUS21225
106109Loginova Tatiana1599RUS210230,50
107116Polozova Marina0RUS1S1817S
10884Butneva Larisa1867RUS1S1816-0,73
10995Shmyreva Tatiana1806RUS1S16S15-0,36
110102Anfinogenova Anastasiya1708RUS1S14S14S-0,25
111104Terentieva Alena1700RUS1S1204S-0,33
11247WFMKiparenko Galina2079RUS1S11S12S-1,61
113121Vasilchuk Tatiana0RUS1S1113
11456Akopova Anna2039RUS117S16
115108Vasiukova Renata D1600RUS115130,11
116100Vanchikova Dulma1719RUS11413-0,48
11796Vasiukova Ekaterina1746RUS11403S-1,00
118110Afanasieva Elena1592RUS113S02-1,05
119107Sotiriadou Ioanna1607GRE11301-0,40
120111Artemenko Rimma1566RUS112S03-0,83
121112Stanetskaya Galina1531RUS111S13-0,16
122106Cherniavskaya Klara1645RUS014S00-1,68


No standings or results yet for the D Group - a swiss for university students - women.


 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...